Executive Summary
This strategy was developed based on studies conducted by national experts and consultants under the guidance of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) Steering Committee and in coordination with all relevant stakeholders. The process included ten Steering Committee meetings, three workshops, and numerous consultations, bilateral discussions, and specialized meetings on the strategy’s key topics, ensuring the active participation of all stakeholders. The strategy also benefited from national biodiversity strategies and action plans submitted to the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity by other countries. This strategy was endorsed by the Steering Committee, which comprised representatives from all relevant ministries and entities, along with national experts.
Egypt possesses a diverse group of ecosystems, wildlife, and aquatic life due to its unique geographical location between Africa and Asia. Many plant and animal species in Egypt represent tropical and Mediterranean environments, some of which date back millions of years. The country is home to more than 22,000 species of plants and animals, 888 of which are endangered, with many found in Egypt’s 30 Protected Areas. Moreover, Egypt’s biodiversity accounts for approximately 1.3% of the world’s biodiversity.
Despite the ongoing efforts and significant achievement, there remains a need for more effective implementation of national policies and plans to address key challenges, including the inability to retain trained personnel, a shortage of multidisciplinary expertise related to nature protection, the lack of funding for monitoring biodiversity and managing protected areas, lost opportunities due to financial constraints, limited cooperation and coordination between sectors and overlapping responsibilities, limited investment in protectorates, unsustainable production and consumption patterns, the degree of activation and application of relevant laws and decisions, limited awareness of the importance and values of biodiversity and ecosystem services, economic crises, regional and global conflicts, crises and natural disasters, difficulties in adapting to rapid international changes, and the risks faced by staff of the protected areas.
To address these challenges, it is necessary to implement effective and innovative solutions including the following: shifting from management culture to performance efficiency, decision-making within the framework of policies to ease the burden on the government through financial sustainability, institutional development for nature protection on economic foundations, adopting a new methodology for preserving biodiversity, introducing innovative and sustainable financing mechanisms, applying decentralization, enforcing existing laws and decisions while enacting of new legislation, reducing encroachments on protected areas, implementing effective plans to manage environmental crises and disasters, and addressing modern trends related to conserving biodiversity.
The preparation and updating of Egypt’s National Biodiversity Strategy came in line with the relevant national strategies and the new government program 2026-2027 “Together we build a sustainable future to ensure a better present and future generations”. The program focuses on an integrated and sustainable environmental system that conserves natural resources and utilizes them optimally in line with sustainable development goals. It also aims to address the effects of climate change, reduce pollution, develop and sustain natural resources, enhance the circular economy, promote a supportive climate for environmental investment, and increase green coverage. Additionally, the strategy aligns with the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, as follows:
First: Reviewing previous national strategies in relation to the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.
A comparison between the national goals formulated in the second National Biodiversity Strategy (2015-2030) and the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework revealed discrepancies between the national and global approaches. The results of the analysis are as follows:
Second: Review and update the national targets for Egyptian biodiversity (2024-2030).
The national biodiversity strategy (2024-2030) included 21 targets across four goals, as follows:
Third: Synergizing national policies and institutions in the global biodiversity framework.
The extent of compatibility of government agencies, processes, legal framework, and national policies with the new Global Biodiversity Framework was reviewed, identifying opportunities and steps to align policies coherently across commitments related to nature, climate, and sustainable development. A set of priority actions were also prepared to address institutional gaps and promote policy coherence through a whole-of-government approach.
The study concluded that despite Egypt’s efforts to address biodiversity loss and environmental challenges, further integration of biodiversity into national development plans, improved policies, and enhanced coordination among stakeholders are needed. Addressing these challenges through a whole-of-government approach and leveraging international support will be critical to achieving sustainable development and preserving biodiversity for future generations.
Fourth: Assessing Egypt’s biodiversity monitoring systems to identify gaps, align with the global biodiversity framework, and develop a monitoring action plan.
A gap analysis was prepared on the indicators included in the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan and the extent of alignment with the decision of the Sixteenth Conference of the Parties on developing an action plan for monitoring indicators of the global biodiversity framework.
More than 1,200 indicators were considered at all levels and were combined into a set of indicators related to cross-cutting indicators in most targets such as spatial planning, nature reserves, invasive species, threatened species, biodiversity, incentives, local communities, gender equality and awareness. Additionally, specific indicators were identified for the implementation of particular targets, such as biosafety, and access to and sharing of benefits arising from the use of genetic resources.
Fifth: Biodiversity Financing Plan.
A Biodiversity Finance Plan was prepared by the Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) in Egypt to provide a comprehensive framework for addressing the critical need for sustainable financing of biodiversity conservation efforts. The proposed solutions include adjusting entrance fees for protected areas and digitizing the collection process, which not only improves revenue collection but also ensures that these funds are reinvested into conservation efforts, enhancing the sustainability of protected areas and visitor experiences. Similarly, revising concession and permit fees for protected areas and systematizing the investor selection process aligns private sector activities with biodiversity conservation while generating additional revenue. Encouraging Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) funding for biodiversity initiatives mobilizes private sector resources for projects such as ecosystem restoration and public awareness campaigns. Exploring and integrating biodiversity-positive carbon credits into the carbon market creates financial incentives that reward emissions reductions while conserving biodiversity, attracting investment, and benefiting ecosystems.
Enhancing the Performance-Based Budget (PBB) system integrates biodiversity into government planning, ensuring efficient resource allocation and fostering accountability. Moreover, developing insurance schemes to address risks to biodiversity creates financial safeguards for ecosystems, incentivizing damage mitigation and restoration. Establishing a roadmap for biodiversity offsets within Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) policies ensures that any residual impacts on biodiversity from development are adequately compensated, aiming for no net loss—and ideally, a net gain—thereby balancing economic growth with biodiversity preservation. Fostering Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) mobilizes private expertise and funding for large-scale biodiversity initiatives, delivering shared benefits. Lastly, mobilizing international funding flows helps bridge financing gaps, enabling the implementation of major conservation projects and fostering global collaboration.
Sixth: Other topics.
During the preparation of the NBSAP, it became clear that in addition to the Global Biodiversity Framework beyond 2020, which includes 23 global goals, there are many topics that are considered cross-cutting issues that were not mentioned in these global goals and that must be taken into account when preparing the NBSAP. For example, but not limited to, the Convention’s work programs on biological diversity. This framework also did not clearly reflect other topics on which decisions were issued at the Fourteenth, Fifteenth and Sixteenth conferences of the parties, including: biodiversity and health, communication strategy, nature and culture, synthetic and generative biology, planning, monitoring, reporting and review mechanisms, and other topics such as synergies with biodiversity-related conventions and organizations, biodiversity and agriculture, and nature-based solutions.
Seventh: A swot analysis of the elements of achieving the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan.
A swot analysis of the elements of achieving the NBSAP 2015-2023 was conducted with the aim of understanding the strengths and weaknesses, as well as the external opportunities and threats that affect the compatibility of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan with the new global framework, which can be exploited or avoided to ensure the sustainability of this system.
According to the above, the NBSAP 2024-2030 was prepared, as follows:
The guiding principles included nearly 30 principles, such as:
To translate this strategic framework into concrete actions, a set of national biodiversity targets has been formulated. The successful implementation of these targets requires a comprehensive and structured approach, supported by well-defined implementation pillars, a robust action plan, and effective monitoring mechanisms.
First: The National Biodiversity Targets 2024 - 2030
Second: Pillars for Implementing the NBSAP 2024-2030
Third: Action Plan
The main objective of the strategy is to ensure that urgent and effective measures are taken to reduce the deterioration of biodiversity in Egypt, reduce pressures on it, and adjust its course toward recovery, ensuring that ecosystems continue to provide their services. Additionally, it aims to ensure the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from the use of its genetic resources, mainstreaming biodiversity consideration into national policies and strategies, and implementing appropriate policies effectively through a participatory approach.
It also requires a clear monitoring and evaluation framework to ensure that progress is monitored, and the desired results are achieved. It includes 21 main targets and sub-targets ranging from 2 to 8 per target, with more than 350 measures and 300 indicators. Furthermore, it identifies the relevant entities responsible for implementation and includes over 60 project proposals to support the effective execution of the strategy.
Fourth: Mechanisms for implementing the strategy and the national action plan for biodiversity
1. Enabling conditions: The national organization for biodiversity in Egypt, which consists of three elements, as follows:
2. Mobilizing resources to implement the strategy.
3. Evaluation and follow-up to ensure the effectiveness of implementation.
Finally, the strategy includes four annexes, covering:
The Steering Committee was formed by a decision of the Minister of Environment in November 2023, with the participation of all relevant entities in the Egyptian government sector, research institutions, experts, civil society, and women's groups. Its purpose is to lead and implement a crucial process: updating national strategies and preparing the Seventh National Report on Biodiversity. The importance of this committee lies in its pivotal role in developing the strategic framework for biodiversity conservation in Egypt. It is responsible for ensuring that this strategy and the report align with long-term national objectives, the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, and other relevant frameworks. The committee is also responsible for setting timelines, gathering input from experts and stakeholders, ensuring transparency in the process, and submitting the final documents to the relevant authorities for approval. Therefore, this committee serves as a central coordinating mechanism to ensure that Egypt fulfills its national and international commitments in the field of nature conservation.
| Language | Url | Tags |
|---|---|---|
| العربية | National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (2024-2030)-AR.pdf | (NBSAP (2024 - 2030), Egypt, Biodiversity, Post-2020 biodiversity framework.) |